2006-02-25

maelorin: (complete boob)
2006-02-25 03:58 pm

just when you think your government can't sink any lower ...

Speech angers Australian Muslims
By Phil Mercer
BBC News, Sydney

A senior member of Australia's government has suggested Muslims who do not uphold the country's values should be stripped of their citizenship.

Remarks by Finance Minister [TreasurerPeter Costello, at a conference in Sydney, have sparked anger among leaders of Australia's Islamic community.

They have insisted his comments were divisive and inflammatory.

Mr Costello said migrants who did not respect Australia's laws and traditions should lose their citizenship.

He singled out the Muslim community and said it had a responsibility to uphold Australian values.

He insisted those people that did not were no longer welcome.

Tensions simmering

Mr Costello said his remarks were directed at a "small radical minority" and that his message had to be "clear and unequivocal".

His speech comes at a time when racial tensions here are still simmering after the disturbances in Sydney last December.

Following an assault on two white coastguards, attacks by white gangs on people of Middle Eastern appearance sparked a bloody feud with young Lebanese Australians.

Islamic leaders have accused Peter Costello of deliberately whipping up more fear and religious hatred.

They have claimed it is further evidence that the government is no longer committed to multi-culturalism.

There has been support for the treasurer's position from Pauline Hanson.

The former right wing politician caused uproar a decade ago when she insisted that Australia was in danger of being overrun by migrants from Asia.

There has been backing too for Mr Costello from his boss, the prime minister.

John Howard was criticised earlier this week for controversial remarks he made about Muslims.

The veteran leader said he was convinced that migrants with extreme views were intent on committing violence here in the name of Islam.

maelorin: (complete boob)
2006-02-25 03:58 pm

just when you think your government can't sink any lower ...

Speech angers Australian Muslims
By Phil Mercer
BBC News, Sydney

A senior member of Australia's government has suggested Muslims who do not uphold the country's values should be stripped of their citizenship.

Remarks by Finance Minister [TreasurerPeter Costello, at a conference in Sydney, have sparked anger among leaders of Australia's Islamic community.

They have insisted his comments were divisive and inflammatory.

Mr Costello said migrants who did not respect Australia's laws and traditions should lose their citizenship.

He singled out the Muslim community and said it had a responsibility to uphold Australian values.

He insisted those people that did not were no longer welcome.

Tensions simmering

Mr Costello said his remarks were directed at a "small radical minority" and that his message had to be "clear and unequivocal".

His speech comes at a time when racial tensions here are still simmering after the disturbances in Sydney last December.

Following an assault on two white coastguards, attacks by white gangs on people of Middle Eastern appearance sparked a bloody feud with young Lebanese Australians.

Islamic leaders have accused Peter Costello of deliberately whipping up more fear and religious hatred.

They have claimed it is further evidence that the government is no longer committed to multi-culturalism.

There has been support for the treasurer's position from Pauline Hanson.

The former right wing politician caused uproar a decade ago when she insisted that Australia was in danger of being overrun by migrants from Asia.

There has been backing too for Mr Costello from his boss, the prime minister.

John Howard was criticised earlier this week for controversial remarks he made about Muslims.

The veteran leader said he was convinced that migrants with extreme views were intent on committing violence here in the name of Islam.

maelorin: (hurt)
2006-02-25 04:33 pm

hurricane katrina fall-in

Thursday, February 23, 2006
White House Katrina report calls for greater military role, legal streamlining
David Shucosky at 12:04 PM ET


[JURIST] The US military should take a greater, perhaps sometimes even temporarily a leading role in disaster recovery, and policy steps should to be taken to facilitate this, according to a 228-page White House report [table of contents and full text; fact sheet] released Thursday on lessons learned from the Hurricane Katrina disaster [JURIST news archive]. Noting that the military response to Hurricane Katrina had been slowed by Defense Department policy and federal law, the study authored by White House homeland security adviser Frances Fragos Townsend [official profile] recommends that the Defense Department develop recommendations for revising the Department of Homeland Security's National Response Plan [DHS backgrounder] to delineate the circumstances, objectives, and limitations of when DOD might temporarily assume the lead for the Federal response to a catastrophe. It also recommends that DOD revise its internal procedures to allow commanders, in appropriate circumstances, to take initiative without a request from local authorities.

The report also includes a call for the US Justice Department to "examine Federal responsibilities for support to State and local law enforcement and criminal justice systems during emergencies and then build operational plans, procedures, and policies to ensure an effective Federal law enforcement response" and a recommendation that "Legal and liability impediments to the use and coordination of non-governmental and private sector resources during a catastrophic event should be removed."

Reuters has more.

military aid to the civil power. gee, what a concept.

mind you, the usa has - and certainly has had - some odd domestic arrangements regarding the use of military assets and personnel. the invention of the so-called 'department for homeland security' has done little to improve the effectiveness or the efficiency of getting military assistance. not that giving the leadership of the federal emergency management agency to some horse guy helped much.

being able to watch all of this from afar probably allows me to watch with fascination, rather than abject horror. or perhaps not. with our government's love affair with all things usa, i wonder how emergency management australia is reponding to this (of being responded for, as our hands on pollies tend to do).

perhaps i'm getting  (more) cynical in my mid-thirties?

maelorin: (hurt)
2006-02-25 04:33 pm

hurricane katrina fall-in

Thursday, February 23, 2006
White House Katrina report calls for greater military role, legal streamlining
David Shucosky at 12:04 PM ET


[JURIST] The US military should take a greater, perhaps sometimes even temporarily a leading role in disaster recovery, and policy steps should to be taken to facilitate this, according to a 228-page White House report [table of contents and full text; fact sheet] released Thursday on lessons learned from the Hurricane Katrina disaster [JURIST news archive]. Noting that the military response to Hurricane Katrina had been slowed by Defense Department policy and federal law, the study authored by White House homeland security adviser Frances Fragos Townsend [official profile] recommends that the Defense Department develop recommendations for revising the Department of Homeland Security's National Response Plan [DHS backgrounder] to delineate the circumstances, objectives, and limitations of when DOD might temporarily assume the lead for the Federal response to a catastrophe. It also recommends that DOD revise its internal procedures to allow commanders, in appropriate circumstances, to take initiative without a request from local authorities.

The report also includes a call for the US Justice Department to "examine Federal responsibilities for support to State and local law enforcement and criminal justice systems during emergencies and then build operational plans, procedures, and policies to ensure an effective Federal law enforcement response" and a recommendation that "Legal and liability impediments to the use and coordination of non-governmental and private sector resources during a catastrophic event should be removed."

Reuters has more.

military aid to the civil power. gee, what a concept.

mind you, the usa has - and certainly has had - some odd domestic arrangements regarding the use of military assets and personnel. the invention of the so-called 'department for homeland security' has done little to improve the effectiveness or the efficiency of getting military assistance. not that giving the leadership of the federal emergency management agency to some horse guy helped much.

being able to watch all of this from afar probably allows me to watch with fascination, rather than abject horror. or perhaps not. with our government's love affair with all things usa, i wonder how emergency management australia is reponding to this (of being responded for, as our hands on pollies tend to do).

perhaps i'm getting  (more) cynical in my mid-thirties?

maelorin: (complete boob)
2006-02-25 04:38 pm

new un human rights body proposed

Thursday, February 23, 2006
UN General Assembly president unveils proposal for new human rights body
Holly Manges Jones at 7:36 PM ET

[JURIST] UN General Assembly President Jan Eliasson [official profile] on Thursday unveiled a draft proposal for a new United Nations human rights body that would replace the highly criticized Commission on Human Rights [UN backgrounder]. The blueprint [PDF text] describes a 47-member Human Rights Council whose membership would be open to all UN member states. States would be elected to the Council by a majority of members of the General Assembly [official website], not two-thirds, as some countries had pushed for. Eliasson also spelled out several ways the proposed Council would differ from the current Commission, including:

  • the new Human Rights Council would be a subsidiary body of the General Assembly and therefore have a higher institutional standing; ...
  • the universal periodic review would be a mechanism where the fulfillment by each State of its human rights obligations would be assessed;
  • the distribution of seats would be in accordance with equitable geographical distribution;
  • members of the Council would not be eligible for immediate re-election after two consecutive terms;
  • while membership of the Human Rights Council would be open to all Member States, there would be legitimate expectations on members. Asserting its standing and authority, the General Assembly would have the ability to suspend a Council member which commits gross and systematic violations of human rights;
  • and lastly, the Human Rights Council would meet regularly throughout the year.

Negotiations [JURIST report] on the new rights body have taken place over the past several months and have not been easy. Drafters from Western nations lobbied for a smaller body that would disallow participation by countries marked with continued human rights violations. Developing countries meanwhile argued against a Western-run committee without inquiries into rights abuses by the US, China and Russia.

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan Thursday urged [transcript] member states to adopt the proposal, saying that "the Council will usher in a new era for the Organization's advancement of human rights -- one built on increased cooperation with Member States, individually and collectively, to help them fulfil their obligations." Watch recorded video [JURIST video] of Eliasson's press briefing on the Human Rights Council proposal.

Reuters has more. The UN News Centre has additional coverage.

12:03 PM ET 2/24/06 - The draft resolution [PDF text] establishing the Human Rights Council is now available online.

maelorin: (complete boob)
2006-02-25 04:38 pm

new un human rights body proposed

Thursday, February 23, 2006
UN General Assembly president unveils proposal for new human rights body
Holly Manges Jones at 7:36 PM ET

[JURIST] UN General Assembly President Jan Eliasson [official profile] on Thursday unveiled a draft proposal for a new United Nations human rights body that would replace the highly criticized Commission on Human Rights [UN backgrounder]. The blueprint [PDF text] describes a 47-member Human Rights Council whose membership would be open to all UN member states. States would be elected to the Council by a majority of members of the General Assembly [official website], not two-thirds, as some countries had pushed for. Eliasson also spelled out several ways the proposed Council would differ from the current Commission, including:

  • the new Human Rights Council would be a subsidiary body of the General Assembly and therefore have a higher institutional standing; ...
  • the universal periodic review would be a mechanism where the fulfillment by each State of its human rights obligations would be assessed;
  • the distribution of seats would be in accordance with equitable geographical distribution;
  • members of the Council would not be eligible for immediate re-election after two consecutive terms;
  • while membership of the Human Rights Council would be open to all Member States, there would be legitimate expectations on members. Asserting its standing and authority, the General Assembly would have the ability to suspend a Council member which commits gross and systematic violations of human rights;
  • and lastly, the Human Rights Council would meet regularly throughout the year.

Negotiations [JURIST report] on the new rights body have taken place over the past several months and have not been easy. Drafters from Western nations lobbied for a smaller body that would disallow participation by countries marked with continued human rights violations. Developing countries meanwhile argued against a Western-run committee without inquiries into rights abuses by the US, China and Russia.

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan Thursday urged [transcript] member states to adopt the proposal, saying that "the Council will usher in a new era for the Organization's advancement of human rights -- one built on increased cooperation with Member States, individually and collectively, to help them fulfil their obligations." Watch recorded video [JURIST video] of Eliasson's press briefing on the Human Rights Council proposal.

Reuters has more. The UN News Centre has additional coverage.

12:03 PM ET 2/24/06 - The draft resolution [PDF text] establishing the Human Rights Council is now available online.

maelorin: (hurt)
2006-02-25 04:45 pm

aaas no likie incompetent design ...

Monday, February 20, 2006
US scientists group slams intelligent design legislation
Krystal MacIntyre at 2:01 PM ET

[JURIST] The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) [group website], the world's largest general scientific society, has denounced legislation and policies [statement, PDF; press release] that "undermine evolution" and "deprive students of the education they need to be informed and productive citizens," referring specifically to pending legislation in 14 states that would "weaken science education." According to an AAAS statement issued at the association's annual meeting which concluded Monday:

Some bills seek to discredit evolution by emphasizing so-called "flaws" in the theory of evolution or "disagreements" within the scientific community. Others insist that teachers have absolute freedom within their classrooms and cannot be disciplined for teaching non-scientific "alternatives" to evolution. A number of bills require that students be taught to "critically analyze" evolution or to understand "the controversy." But there is no significant controversy within the scientific community about the validity of the theory of evolution. The current controversy surrounding the teaching of evolution is not a scientific one. ...

Many of the proposed bills and policies aim explicitly or implicitly at encouraging the teaching of "Intelligent Design" in science classes as an alternative to evolution. Although advocates of Intelligent Design usually avoid mentioning a specific creator, the concept is in fact religious, not scientific.

The AAAS praised the December 2005 federal court opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover School District [PDF text; JURIST report], holding that a Pennsylvania public school district's policy of teaching intelligent design [JURIST news archive] as an alternative to evolution was an unconstitutional violation of the Establishment Clause.

Newsday has more.

maelorin: (hurt)
2006-02-25 04:45 pm

aaas no likie incompetent design ...

Monday, February 20, 2006
US scientists group slams intelligent design legislation
Krystal MacIntyre at 2:01 PM ET

[JURIST] The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) [group website], the world's largest general scientific society, has denounced legislation and policies [statement, PDF; press release] that "undermine evolution" and "deprive students of the education they need to be informed and productive citizens," referring specifically to pending legislation in 14 states that would "weaken science education." According to an AAAS statement issued at the association's annual meeting which concluded Monday:

Some bills seek to discredit evolution by emphasizing so-called "flaws" in the theory of evolution or "disagreements" within the scientific community. Others insist that teachers have absolute freedom within their classrooms and cannot be disciplined for teaching non-scientific "alternatives" to evolution. A number of bills require that students be taught to "critically analyze" evolution or to understand "the controversy." But there is no significant controversy within the scientific community about the validity of the theory of evolution. The current controversy surrounding the teaching of evolution is not a scientific one. ...

Many of the proposed bills and policies aim explicitly or implicitly at encouraging the teaching of "Intelligent Design" in science classes as an alternative to evolution. Although advocates of Intelligent Design usually avoid mentioning a specific creator, the concept is in fact religious, not scientific.

The AAAS praised the December 2005 federal court opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover School District [PDF text; JURIST report], holding that a Pennsylvania public school district's policy of teaching intelligent design [JURIST news archive] as an alternative to evolution was an unconstitutional violation of the Establishment Clause.

Newsday has more.

maelorin: (hurt)
2006-02-25 07:54 pm

hackers on medicare smart card waiting list

Hackers on Medicare smart card waiting list
Renai LeMay, ZDNet Australia
February 24, 2005
http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/security/soa/Hackers_on_Medicare_smart_card_waiting_list/0,2000061744,39182294,00.htm

Privacy advocates have slammed the new Medicare Smartcard, describing it as an insecure and technologically inept implementation.

Furthermore, questions exist as to why the government is even implementing the technology in the first place, with Executive Director of Electronic Frontiers Australia EFA) Irene Graham saying potential exists for the card to become a new unique identification card similar to the proposed Australia card which the the federal government tried to introduce it in the 1980s. Muddying the issue further, even the government's own statements on the card appear to contradict themselves.

The card, which was launched in July 2004, is designed to provide secure access to the federal government's new HealthConnect HC) system, which combines Australia's hodge-podge of medical record databases into a single network. HC is undergoing extensive trials in Tasmania and South Australia, and the card itself is currently undergoing a trial in Tasmania. To date, over 800 Tasmanians have voluntarily registered for the card.

Speaking with ZDNet Australia on the issue, Graham said: "The information that they're putting out makes it sound like the whole thing is totally insecure. There's also the question of exactly what information is going to be on the Smartcard. As far as I can understand it at the moment, the actual Medicare Smartcard will not have your health records on it, but you will somehow have to use this card to be able to access the records that are stored in the HC database." Graham also commented that she understood that a new HC identification number would be stored on the card, which would refer to a citizen's record in the HC online database.

Earlier on in the week, Graham appealed to her organisations' privacy-focused email discussion list for information on the card, saying: "Surely this cannot be such a technologically clueless implementation as it appears to be. Am I missing something? If so, what?" Further discussion on the list focused on the fact that the potential benefits of smart card technology comes from an ability to provide challenge/response authentication services within the card itself – a feature which the Medicare Smartcard does not utilise.

While Jenn Stonebridge, a spokesperson from the Health Insurance Commission told ZDNet Australia that the card "does not currently contain a HC ID number", Stonebridge also mentioned that "it is anticipated that with the introduction of HC in Tasmania in mid-2005 a consumer participating in HC will have a HC Access Number linked to their HC profile." A presentation by HC Manager Suzanne Roche at an Australian Government Information Management Office AGIMO) information forum back in September 2004 also confirmed the government's plans for a HC Access Number to be stored on the card.

This unique HC ID number is, according to Graham, one of the real privacy dangers of the system, as it would create a national unique identification number if the card was rolled out nationally.

"It seems to be that on the card, at the very least, there is going to have to be a HC number for each individual. To me, there is this potential for the Medicare card to increasingly become a unique ID number and card. You can't just get a new Medicare card, you have to provide 100 points of ID, just like a bank card. So Medicare cards are going to become claimed to be one of the most secure evidence of ID documents that exist in Australia. I can just see this heading down the track to the Australia card."

Graham said some basic questions need to be answered by the government – questions like "Why have we got a Smartcard in the first place? And why is it so insecure?"

However, according to Graham, the real danger to citizens comes when the HC ID number is linked up with a citizen's health record on the HC online database. "If there's no PIN on the Smartcard," said Graham, "I don't understand what is going to control access to the HC database. They talk about having a secret question, like – what is your mother's maiden name – that's the example they use on the brochures on the Health Insurance Commission web site."

But Graham says this sort of question would negate the purpose of the Smartcard technology: "If there is a secret question like this, that you have to use, to get access to your records on a HC database, then what have you got a Smartcard for?"

And the Office of the Federal Privacy Commissioner OPC) has also weighed in on the card's lack of PIN security, saying in a submission on the HC business architecture BA): "There is some ambiguity in the BA surrounding [HC online] registration for consumers who have a proposed) Medicare Smartcard." Pointing out that several pages in the BA make reference to a PIN, the FPC went on to say: "It is the OPC's understanding that the Medicare Smartcard will not have a PIN or other attributes which could be used by consumers for secure online authentication."

Furthermore, "if a Medicare Smartcard is stolen, it is unclear what would prevent an individual from enrolling another person in HC ... and then obtaining health information on that person by instigating the process of establishing the initial health profile ... Such a possibility may also raise identity theft risks," said the submission.

It is also possible in the future that simple medical data such as drug reactions and allergies will be stored on the card. While Stonebridge told ZDNet Australia that "There is no personal health information stored on the Medicare Smartcard or the standard Medicare card," Graham said that "there's vague commentary about – at the next stage – people may be able to include their details about allergies and drug reactions and things – on the card!"

Graham went on to say: "Personally I wouldn't want my drug reactions and allergies and things on a card that anybody can swipe through a machine and find out what they are! This all strikes me as exceedingly dangerous information. You don't want other people knowing what drugs you're allergic to – or I don't think you do."

Stonebridge was quick to react to the possibility of health information being stored on the card, saying: "The protection of any personal health information which may be stored on the Medicare Smartcard in the future that is, adverse drug reaction, emergency contact details) is of paramount importance to HIC and would only be implemented following advice from the OPC. If the role of the Medicare Smartcard is to be expanded it will be done in consultation with the Privacy Commissioner."

Irene Graham has this week been completing EFA's submission to a Senate Committee inquiry into the Commonwealth Privacy Act. The submission will contain a section expressing the EFA's concerns about security and privacy issues surrounding the Medicare Smartcard.

according to the medicare australia website:

"The new Medicare smartcard, is the first step in what is an exciting new way for you to manage your health information in the future."

i can't think of a single way that 'managing' my 'healthcare information' could possibly be 'exciting' ... well ... no. still not exciting. potentially interesting. but not exciting.

maelorin: (hurt)
2006-02-25 07:54 pm

hackers on medicare smart card waiting list

Hackers on Medicare smart card waiting list
Renai LeMay, ZDNet Australia
February 24, 2005
http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/security/soa/Hackers_on_Medicare_smart_card_waiting_list/0,2000061744,39182294,00.htm

Privacy advocates have slammed the new Medicare Smartcard, describing it as an insecure and technologically inept implementation.

Furthermore, questions exist as to why the government is even implementing the technology in the first place, with Executive Director of Electronic Frontiers Australia EFA) Irene Graham saying potential exists for the card to become a new unique identification card similar to the proposed Australia card which the the federal government tried to introduce it in the 1980s. Muddying the issue further, even the government's own statements on the card appear to contradict themselves.

The card, which was launched in July 2004, is designed to provide secure access to the federal government's new HealthConnect HC) system, which combines Australia's hodge-podge of medical record databases into a single network. HC is undergoing extensive trials in Tasmania and South Australia, and the card itself is currently undergoing a trial in Tasmania. To date, over 800 Tasmanians have voluntarily registered for the card.

Speaking with ZDNet Australia on the issue, Graham said: "The information that they're putting out makes it sound like the whole thing is totally insecure. There's also the question of exactly what information is going to be on the Smartcard. As far as I can understand it at the moment, the actual Medicare Smartcard will not have your health records on it, but you will somehow have to use this card to be able to access the records that are stored in the HC database." Graham also commented that she understood that a new HC identification number would be stored on the card, which would refer to a citizen's record in the HC online database.

Earlier on in the week, Graham appealed to her organisations' privacy-focused email discussion list for information on the card, saying: "Surely this cannot be such a technologically clueless implementation as it appears to be. Am I missing something? If so, what?" Further discussion on the list focused on the fact that the potential benefits of smart card technology comes from an ability to provide challenge/response authentication services within the card itself – a feature which the Medicare Smartcard does not utilise.

While Jenn Stonebridge, a spokesperson from the Health Insurance Commission told ZDNet Australia that the card "does not currently contain a HC ID number", Stonebridge also mentioned that "it is anticipated that with the introduction of HC in Tasmania in mid-2005 a consumer participating in HC will have a HC Access Number linked to their HC profile." A presentation by HC Manager Suzanne Roche at an Australian Government Information Management Office AGIMO) information forum back in September 2004 also confirmed the government's plans for a HC Access Number to be stored on the card.

This unique HC ID number is, according to Graham, one of the real privacy dangers of the system, as it would create a national unique identification number if the card was rolled out nationally.

"It seems to be that on the card, at the very least, there is going to have to be a HC number for each individual. To me, there is this potential for the Medicare card to increasingly become a unique ID number and card. You can't just get a new Medicare card, you have to provide 100 points of ID, just like a bank card. So Medicare cards are going to become claimed to be one of the most secure evidence of ID documents that exist in Australia. I can just see this heading down the track to the Australia card."

Graham said some basic questions need to be answered by the government – questions like "Why have we got a Smartcard in the first place? And why is it so insecure?"

However, according to Graham, the real danger to citizens comes when the HC ID number is linked up with a citizen's health record on the HC online database. "If there's no PIN on the Smartcard," said Graham, "I don't understand what is going to control access to the HC database. They talk about having a secret question, like – what is your mother's maiden name – that's the example they use on the brochures on the Health Insurance Commission web site."

But Graham says this sort of question would negate the purpose of the Smartcard technology: "If there is a secret question like this, that you have to use, to get access to your records on a HC database, then what have you got a Smartcard for?"

And the Office of the Federal Privacy Commissioner OPC) has also weighed in on the card's lack of PIN security, saying in a submission on the HC business architecture BA): "There is some ambiguity in the BA surrounding [HC online] registration for consumers who have a proposed) Medicare Smartcard." Pointing out that several pages in the BA make reference to a PIN, the FPC went on to say: "It is the OPC's understanding that the Medicare Smartcard will not have a PIN or other attributes which could be used by consumers for secure online authentication."

Furthermore, "if a Medicare Smartcard is stolen, it is unclear what would prevent an individual from enrolling another person in HC ... and then obtaining health information on that person by instigating the process of establishing the initial health profile ... Such a possibility may also raise identity theft risks," said the submission.

It is also possible in the future that simple medical data such as drug reactions and allergies will be stored on the card. While Stonebridge told ZDNet Australia that "There is no personal health information stored on the Medicare Smartcard or the standard Medicare card," Graham said that "there's vague commentary about – at the next stage – people may be able to include their details about allergies and drug reactions and things – on the card!"

Graham went on to say: "Personally I wouldn't want my drug reactions and allergies and things on a card that anybody can swipe through a machine and find out what they are! This all strikes me as exceedingly dangerous information. You don't want other people knowing what drugs you're allergic to – or I don't think you do."

Stonebridge was quick to react to the possibility of health information being stored on the card, saying: "The protection of any personal health information which may be stored on the Medicare Smartcard in the future that is, adverse drug reaction, emergency contact details) is of paramount importance to HIC and would only be implemented following advice from the OPC. If the role of the Medicare Smartcard is to be expanded it will be done in consultation with the Privacy Commissioner."

Irene Graham has this week been completing EFA's submission to a Senate Committee inquiry into the Commonwealth Privacy Act. The submission will contain a section expressing the EFA's concerns about security and privacy issues surrounding the Medicare Smartcard.

according to the medicare australia website:

"The new Medicare smartcard, is the first step in what is an exciting new way for you to manage your health information in the future."

i can't think of a single way that 'managing' my 'healthcare information' could possibly be 'exciting' ... well ... no. still not exciting. potentially interesting. but not exciting.

maelorin: (hurt)
2006-02-25 09:44 pm

Supporting the System that Supports You

Centrelink's lack of data integrity
Iain Ferguson, ZDNet Australia
February 20, 2006

commentary

Centrelink mandarins and their government masters may be feeling a tad red-faced. 

The government's mail and television campaign warning welfare recipients to report changes of circumstance has been neatly skewered by revelations an audit report found the social security agency's core customer database was riddled with errors.

An investigation by the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) between April and October 2005 listed a litany of problems with the so-called Income Security Integrated System (ISIS), including:

  • Up to three percent of Centrelink customers "appear to have been registered more than once [on the database]";
  • Centrelink's failure to properly use or update ISIS' data integrity error detection and reporting system;
  • Keeping records of around 1.5 million deceased people on the production environment of the database, "risking the integrity of Centrelink payments";
  • Up to 7,000 customer records -- 3,500 pairs of records -- showed the same Tax File Number (which is meant to be exclusive to an individual) and;
  • Up to 30 percent of recorded details on being "insufficient or unreliable" in identifying customers.

The ANAO softened the blow slightly by giving Centrelink a pass mark overall.

"ANAO concluded that Centrelink's electronic customer records are, generally, sufficiently accurate and complete to support the effective administration of the range of social security programs for which Centrelink is responsible".

Despite the less-than-ringing overall endorsement, the report has identified glaring omissions in management of records determining how AU$60-odd billion in welfare payments are made each year.

The campaign catchphrase "Supporting the System that Supports You" rings a tad hollow when that system is clearly flawed and needs extensive work.

To Centrelink's credit, it has moved to address some of the ANAO's findings -- for example, it has established a team to develop a longer-term data quality strategy and improvement program -- but questions need to be answered about how the problems arose in the first place.

The report is a timely reminder to organisations about the need to commit to applying strict rules governing the collection, input and maintenance of data. The alternative is wastage, embarrassment and firefighting. No manager wants to be in that position.

the anao report in question being:

Integrity of Electronic Customer Records, Centrelink [Adobe PDF]
Performance Audit No. 29
Tabled: 15/02/2006

Background

  1. ... Centrelink relies on large and complex information technology (IT) systems to support its extensive business operations. The heart of Centrelink’s IT systems is ISIS — the Income Security Integrated System — Centrelink’s main customer database.


  2. In 2004–05, Centrelink’s IT systems performed more than 5.2 billion electronic computations and processed some $63 billion of social security payments to over six million customers. Centrelink grants approximately 2.8 million new claims each year. At September 2005, the ISIS database held information on over 23 million customers — recording details of customers’ identity, circumstances and eligibility for benefits under various social security programmes. Approximately 6.2 million of the 23 million records relate to customers with a current benefit determination.


  3. In order to distinguish between customer records, a unique identifier is assigned to each record — the Centrelink Reference Number, or CRN. The information in ISIS is organised around the CRN, which links customer information in various parts of the database. For example, the CRN links information on a customer’s circumstances and benefit determinations with that in the payments file.


  4. Customer information is spread across eleven networked computing environments, with each environment, essentially, servicing a region, state or territory within Australia. Centrelink’s data holdings are growing at a rate of approximately 30 per cent each year, and at September 2005, the ISIS database held information in over 440 billion fields, with an average of 21 000 fields of information per customer.

the anao were not the only ones to criticise the centrelink system, nor the first.

in february 2000, the
department of employment and workplace relations evaluation & program performance branch published a report on the (then) recently implemented job network; Job Network evaluation - Stage one implementation and market development

In qualitative research, the computer systems (Integrated Employment System [IES] in particular, but also the Income Security Integrated System) were criticised by Job Network members and Centrelink staff. In relation to IES, there were criticisms of data quality and system functionality. While changes have been made, users felt the system could be further improved if it was made more user-friendly and allowed for easier input and extraction of information. Work on refining the IES functionality is continuing through the Job Network Information Technology Working Group and the Systems Integration Strategic Committee.

i try to look sufficiently shocked and awed when i read reports like these. but i'm not. not really.

none of the issues i've read about over the past few years surprise me - since i've seen them and had to help people - who get paid - to use the system - so that i can get 'paid'. i've outlined (in some detail) problems i had identified with the centrelink system on at least two occasions. problems that it seems had to wait for the accountants in the anao to stumble over before anything got done.

but then, i'm only a 'client'. 

just one of the 23 million getting a 'share' of the au$63 billion dollars allocated to the social security system. a large chunk of which must be going to salaries, wages, and running costs ... such as developing and maintaining the centrelink computer system ...

maelorin: (hurt)
2006-02-25 09:44 pm

Supporting the System that Supports You

Centrelink's lack of data integrity
Iain Ferguson, ZDNet Australia
February 20, 2006

commentary

Centrelink mandarins and their government masters may be feeling a tad red-faced. 

The government's mail and television campaign warning welfare recipients to report changes of circumstance has been neatly skewered by revelations an audit report found the social security agency's core customer database was riddled with errors.

An investigation by the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) between April and October 2005 listed a litany of problems with the so-called Income Security Integrated System (ISIS), including:

  • Up to three percent of Centrelink customers "appear to have been registered more than once [on the database]";
  • Centrelink's failure to properly use or update ISIS' data integrity error detection and reporting system;
  • Keeping records of around 1.5 million deceased people on the production environment of the database, "risking the integrity of Centrelink payments";
  • Up to 7,000 customer records -- 3,500 pairs of records -- showed the same Tax File Number (which is meant to be exclusive to an individual) and;
  • Up to 30 percent of recorded details on being "insufficient or unreliable" in identifying customers.

The ANAO softened the blow slightly by giving Centrelink a pass mark overall.

"ANAO concluded that Centrelink's electronic customer records are, generally, sufficiently accurate and complete to support the effective administration of the range of social security programs for which Centrelink is responsible".

Despite the less-than-ringing overall endorsement, the report has identified glaring omissions in management of records determining how AU$60-odd billion in welfare payments are made each year.

The campaign catchphrase "Supporting the System that Supports You" rings a tad hollow when that system is clearly flawed and needs extensive work.

To Centrelink's credit, it has moved to address some of the ANAO's findings -- for example, it has established a team to develop a longer-term data quality strategy and improvement program -- but questions need to be answered about how the problems arose in the first place.

The report is a timely reminder to organisations about the need to commit to applying strict rules governing the collection, input and maintenance of data. The alternative is wastage, embarrassment and firefighting. No manager wants to be in that position.

the anao report in question being:

Integrity of Electronic Customer Records, Centrelink [Adobe PDF]
Performance Audit No. 29
Tabled: 15/02/2006

Background

  1. ... Centrelink relies on large and complex information technology (IT) systems to support its extensive business operations. The heart of Centrelink’s IT systems is ISIS — the Income Security Integrated System — Centrelink’s main customer database.


  2. In 2004–05, Centrelink’s IT systems performed more than 5.2 billion electronic computations and processed some $63 billion of social security payments to over six million customers. Centrelink grants approximately 2.8 million new claims each year. At September 2005, the ISIS database held information on over 23 million customers — recording details of customers’ identity, circumstances and eligibility for benefits under various social security programmes. Approximately 6.2 million of the 23 million records relate to customers with a current benefit determination.


  3. In order to distinguish between customer records, a unique identifier is assigned to each record — the Centrelink Reference Number, or CRN. The information in ISIS is organised around the CRN, which links customer information in various parts of the database. For example, the CRN links information on a customer’s circumstances and benefit determinations with that in the payments file.


  4. Customer information is spread across eleven networked computing environments, with each environment, essentially, servicing a region, state or territory within Australia. Centrelink’s data holdings are growing at a rate of approximately 30 per cent each year, and at September 2005, the ISIS database held information in over 440 billion fields, with an average of 21 000 fields of information per customer.

the anao were not the only ones to criticise the centrelink system, nor the first.

in february 2000, the
department of employment and workplace relations evaluation & program performance branch published a report on the (then) recently implemented job network; Job Network evaluation - Stage one implementation and market development

In qualitative research, the computer systems (Integrated Employment System [IES] in particular, but also the Income Security Integrated System) were criticised by Job Network members and Centrelink staff. In relation to IES, there were criticisms of data quality and system functionality. While changes have been made, users felt the system could be further improved if it was made more user-friendly and allowed for easier input and extraction of information. Work on refining the IES functionality is continuing through the Job Network Information Technology Working Group and the Systems Integration Strategic Committee.

i try to look sufficiently shocked and awed when i read reports like these. but i'm not. not really.

none of the issues i've read about over the past few years surprise me - since i've seen them and had to help people - who get paid - to use the system - so that i can get 'paid'. i've outlined (in some detail) problems i had identified with the centrelink system on at least two occasions. problems that it seems had to wait for the accountants in the anao to stumble over before anything got done.

but then, i'm only a 'client'. 

just one of the 23 million getting a 'share' of the au$63 billion dollars allocated to the social security system. a large chunk of which must be going to salaries, wages, and running costs ... such as developing and maintaining the centrelink computer system ...

maelorin: (complete boob)
2006-02-25 10:17 pm
Entry tags:

if only he wasn't kidding

US losing web war, says Rumsfeld
Daniel Trotta in New York
FEBRUARY 20, 2006

THE US lags al Qaida in getting out information in the digital media age and must update its old-fashioned methods, Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said

Modernisation is crucial to winning the hearts and minds of Muslims worldwide who are bombarded with negative images of the West, Mr Rumsfeld told the Council on Foreign Relations.

The Pentagon chief said today's weapons of war included email, Blackberries, instant messaging, digital cameras and blogs.

"Our enemies have skillfully adapted to fighting wars in today's media age, but ? our country has not adapted," Mr Rumsfeld said.

"For the most part, the US government still functions as a 'five and dime' store in an eBay world," Mr Rumsfeld said.

Mr Rumsfeld said US military public affairs officers must learn to anticipate news and respond faster, and good public affairs officers should be rewarded with promotions.

The military's information offices still operate mostly eight hours a day, five or six days a week while the challenges they faces occur 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Mr Rumsfeld called that a "dangerous deficiency."

Democrat Senator Ted Kennedy immediately criticised Mr Rumsfeld as missing the point.

"Clearly, we need to improve our public diplomacy and information age communication in the Muslim world," Senator Kennedy said in a statement. "But nothing has done more to encourage increased al Qaida recruitment and made America less safe than the war in Iraq and the incompetent way it's been managed. Our greatest failure is our policy."

Mr Rumsfeld said that vast media attention about US abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq outweighed that given to the discovery of "Saddam Hussein's mass graves".

On the emergence of satellite television and other media not under Arab state control, he said, "While al Qaeda and extremist movements have utilised this forum for many years - we in the government have barely even begun to compete in reaching their audiences."

Reuters

wtfomgbbq!
maelorin: (complete boob)
2006-02-25 10:17 pm
Entry tags:

if only he wasn't kidding

US losing web war, says Rumsfeld
Daniel Trotta in New York
FEBRUARY 20, 2006

THE US lags al Qaida in getting out information in the digital media age and must update its old-fashioned methods, Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said

Modernisation is crucial to winning the hearts and minds of Muslims worldwide who are bombarded with negative images of the West, Mr Rumsfeld told the Council on Foreign Relations.

The Pentagon chief said today's weapons of war included email, Blackberries, instant messaging, digital cameras and blogs.

"Our enemies have skillfully adapted to fighting wars in today's media age, but ? our country has not adapted," Mr Rumsfeld said.

"For the most part, the US government still functions as a 'five and dime' store in an eBay world," Mr Rumsfeld said.

Mr Rumsfeld said US military public affairs officers must learn to anticipate news and respond faster, and good public affairs officers should be rewarded with promotions.

The military's information offices still operate mostly eight hours a day, five or six days a week while the challenges they faces occur 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Mr Rumsfeld called that a "dangerous deficiency."

Democrat Senator Ted Kennedy immediately criticised Mr Rumsfeld as missing the point.

"Clearly, we need to improve our public diplomacy and information age communication in the Muslim world," Senator Kennedy said in a statement. "But nothing has done more to encourage increased al Qaida recruitment and made America less safe than the war in Iraq and the incompetent way it's been managed. Our greatest failure is our policy."

Mr Rumsfeld said that vast media attention about US abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq outweighed that given to the discovery of "Saddam Hussein's mass graves".

On the emergence of satellite television and other media not under Arab state control, he said, "While al Qaeda and extremist movements have utilised this forum for many years - we in the government have barely even begun to compete in reaching their audiences."

Reuters

wtfomgbbq!
maelorin: (hurt)
2006-02-25 11:08 pm
Entry tags:

and then i pin down the cause of my unhappiness ...

in a recent reply to a comment, i managed to sum up what's really pissing me off at the moment.

much is happening at the moment that disturbs me deeply ... i can't help feeling like i'm stuck at a railway siding, watching events unfold in quiet desperation, with a sense of growing dread that while i'm not the only one who's concerned about an impending train-wreck, i find myself excluded and unable to do anything about what i see coming.

maelorin: (hurt)
2006-02-25 11:08 pm
Entry tags:

and then i pin down the cause of my unhappiness ...

in a recent reply to a comment, i managed to sum up what's really pissing me off at the moment.

much is happening at the moment that disturbs me deeply ... i can't help feeling like i'm stuck at a railway siding, watching events unfold in quiet desperation, with a sense of growing dread that while i'm not the only one who's concerned about an impending train-wreck, i find myself excluded and unable to do anything about what i see coming.

maelorin: (complete boob)
2006-02-25 11:55 pm
Entry tags:
maelorin: (complete boob)
2006-02-25 11:55 pm
Entry tags: