![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
stupid design, again
stupid design™ seems sensible and sane, until you ask dumb questions like:
as![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
leminkainen points out, "Intelligent design didn't create the TVs that televangelists speak through..."
it will be interesting to see how things progress when it finally occurs to the masses that stupid design™ doesn't offer them the things they've become accustomed to from the science & engineering family.
if it's a theory, what does it predict?after all, if it is supposed to supplant or supplement science, surely it ought to achieve similar things?
if it's a methodology, how do you do it?
as
leminkainen points out, "Intelligent design didn't create the TVs that televangelists speak through..."it will be interesting to see how things progress when it finally occurs to the masses that stupid design™ doesn't offer them the things they've become accustomed to from the science & engineering family.