maelorin: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] maelorin at 01:24pm on 24/02/2006 under , ,
Monday, February 20, 2006
Denmark may ban religious slander after Muhammad cartoons furor
Katerina Ossenova at 6:53 PM ET

[JURIST] The Danish ambassador to Saudi Arabia has said that Denmark will take steps to ban religious slander in accordance with Danish and European laws, according to reports Monday. As a result of the publication of caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad [JURIST news archive], Ambassador Hanz Kingburgh met with Muslim World League [advocacy website] General Secretary Abdullah al-Turki Monday and discussed Denmark's plans to take legal measures as well as offering the apology offered by the Danish newspaper which was reprinted in the Saudi press over the weekend. The cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad first appeared in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten [media website] in September and were later reprinted [Le Monde slide show] in other European and world papers, sparking violent protests the Middle East and Asia. UPI has more. EU officials have to this point been unreceptive to suggestions tha tthe regional block adopt formal laws banning religious slander, but EU foreign affairs chief Javier Solana said last week after a meeting with the head of the Organization of the Islamic Conference [official website] that the EU and the OIC "are considering certain ideas to safeguard and protect religious values in general, but the time is not appropriate to disclose the details."

UPI has more.

Meanwhile, a Shariat Court in India has issued a religious decree sentencing the author of the Danish cartoons to death. The fatwa [Wikipedia backgrounder] was issued Sunday after an Indian provincial minister announced a cash reward for the person beheading the cartoonist, but its significance in India is debatable as Islamic law does not formally apply in the Hindu state. Local Muslim leaders insist, however, that it is applicable wherever Muslims live.

Press Trust of India has more.

at what point can we say, enough is enough? can we distinguish between genuine offence and hypersensitivity? must we be sensitive to every belief, every strongly held disapprobation? and just as importantly, how could we?

[on a different point, the response to the cartoons - and in particular they way the response spread - is very suggestive of a propaganda event: something used as a trigger to further the agenda of propagandists, rather than being an entirely  spontaneous response.]
Mood:: 'listless' listless

Reply

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
          1
 
2
 
3
 
4 5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31