posted by
maelorin at 09:26pm on 05/10/2006 under evidence, guantanamo, hicks, military commission, torture
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
And just how will anyone in the room know that evidence led by the prosecution was not coerced? (I think we can presume that no protest raised by David at the commission's hearing will carry any weight.)Australia AG insists Hicks military trial will not hear evidence coerced by torture
[JURIST] The US military commission expected to try Australian Guantanamo detainee David Hicks will not allow evidence coerced through torture, Australian Attorney General Philip Ruddock told... [more].
More importantly, how can we trust this assertion by our AG?
There are no comments on this entry.