I'm beginning to suspect that ID proponents believe in Creationism, but not their own pseudo-science. I spent way too long last night reading expert testimony against ID on the ACLU site, and I'm beginning to suspect that there is nothing at all sincere about the presentation of "evidence" supporting ID.

I shouldn't be surprised I know, but I think I had assumed they were all just willfully ignorant. Having now seen how elaborate and technical some of their arguments are, I don't see how they could generate them without realising that they were distorting science and sometimes outright lying about it.