maelorin: (complete boob)
posted by [personal profile] maelorin at 04:38pm on 25/02/2006 under , , , ,
Thursday, February 23, 2006
UN General Assembly president unveils proposal for new human rights body
Holly Manges Jones at 7:36 PM ET

[JURIST] UN General Assembly President Jan Eliasson [official profile] on Thursday unveiled a draft proposal for a new United Nations human rights body that would replace the highly criticized Commission on Human Rights [UN backgrounder]. The blueprint [PDF text] describes a 47-member Human Rights Council whose membership would be open to all UN member states. States would be elected to the Council by a majority of members of the General Assembly [official website], not two-thirds, as some countries had pushed for. Eliasson also spelled out several ways the proposed Council would differ from the current Commission, including:

  • the new Human Rights Council would be a subsidiary body of the General Assembly and therefore have a higher institutional standing; ...
  • the universal periodic review would be a mechanism where the fulfillment by each State of its human rights obligations would be assessed;
  • the distribution of seats would be in accordance with equitable geographical distribution;
  • members of the Council would not be eligible for immediate re-election after two consecutive terms;
  • while membership of the Human Rights Council would be open to all Member States, there would be legitimate expectations on members. Asserting its standing and authority, the General Assembly would have the ability to suspend a Council member which commits gross and systematic violations of human rights;
  • and lastly, the Human Rights Council would meet regularly throughout the year.

Negotiations [JURIST report] on the new rights body have taken place over the past several months and have not been easy. Drafters from Western nations lobbied for a smaller body that would disallow participation by countries marked with continued human rights violations. Developing countries meanwhile argued against a Western-run committee without inquiries into rights abuses by the US, China and Russia.

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan Thursday urged [transcript] member states to adopt the proposal, saying that "the Council will usher in a new era for the Organization's advancement of human rights -- one built on increased cooperation with Member States, individually and collectively, to help them fulfil their obligations." Watch recorded video [JURIST video] of Eliasson's press briefing on the Human Rights Council proposal.

Reuters has more. The UN News Centre has additional coverage.

12:03 PM ET 2/24/06 - The draft resolution [PDF text] establishing the Human Rights Council is now available online.

Music:: star wars: empire at war
Mood:: 'touched' touched
maelorin: (complete boob)
posted by [personal profile] maelorin at 04:38pm on 25/02/2006 under , , , ,
Thursday, February 23, 2006
UN General Assembly president unveils proposal for new human rights body
Holly Manges Jones at 7:36 PM ET

[JURIST] UN General Assembly President Jan Eliasson [official profile] on Thursday unveiled a draft proposal for a new United Nations human rights body that would replace the highly criticized Commission on Human Rights [UN backgrounder]. The blueprint [PDF text] describes a 47-member Human Rights Council whose membership would be open to all UN member states. States would be elected to the Council by a majority of members of the General Assembly [official website], not two-thirds, as some countries had pushed for. Eliasson also spelled out several ways the proposed Council would differ from the current Commission, including:

  • the new Human Rights Council would be a subsidiary body of the General Assembly and therefore have a higher institutional standing; ...
  • the universal periodic review would be a mechanism where the fulfillment by each State of its human rights obligations would be assessed;
  • the distribution of seats would be in accordance with equitable geographical distribution;
  • members of the Council would not be eligible for immediate re-election after two consecutive terms;
  • while membership of the Human Rights Council would be open to all Member States, there would be legitimate expectations on members. Asserting its standing and authority, the General Assembly would have the ability to suspend a Council member which commits gross and systematic violations of human rights;
  • and lastly, the Human Rights Council would meet regularly throughout the year.

Negotiations [JURIST report] on the new rights body have taken place over the past several months and have not been easy. Drafters from Western nations lobbied for a smaller body that would disallow participation by countries marked with continued human rights violations. Developing countries meanwhile argued against a Western-run committee without inquiries into rights abuses by the US, China and Russia.

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan Thursday urged [transcript] member states to adopt the proposal, saying that "the Council will usher in a new era for the Organization's advancement of human rights -- one built on increased cooperation with Member States, individually and collectively, to help them fulfil their obligations." Watch recorded video [JURIST video] of Eliasson's press briefing on the Human Rights Council proposal.

Reuters has more. The UN News Centre has additional coverage.

12:03 PM ET 2/24/06 - The draft resolution [PDF text] establishing the Human Rights Council is now available online.

Music:: star wars: empire at war
Mood:: 'touched' touched
maelorin: (hurt)
Music:: Black Eyed Peas - Like That (Feat. Cee-Lo, John Legend, Talib Kweli & Q-Tip)
Mood:: 'cranky' cranky
maelorin: (hurt)
Music:: Black Eyed Peas - Like That (Feat. Cee-Lo, John Legend, Talib Kweli & Q-Tip)
Mood:: 'cranky' cranky
maelorin: (hurt)
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURST

ABA head warns against 'taking shortcuts' with Constitution

Saturday, February 11, 2006
Greg Sampson at 10:34 AM ET

Read more... )
Mood:: 'gloomy' gloomy
Music:: avenue q - only for now
maelorin: (hurt)
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURST

ABA head warns against 'taking shortcuts' with Constitution

Saturday, February 11, 2006
Greg Sampson at 10:34 AM ET

Read more... )
Music:: avenue q - only for now
Mood:: 'gloomy' gloomy
maelorin: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] maelorin at 12:35am on 28/10/2005 under , , , ,
Music:: dido - life for rent
Mood:: 'indescribable' indescribable
maelorin: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] maelorin at 12:35am on 28/10/2005 under , , , ,
Music:: dido - life for rent
Mood:: 'indescribable' indescribable
maelorin: (transmetro)
posted by [personal profile] maelorin at 08:51pm on 14/10/2005 under , , ,
Why is eugenics so attractive to people, even - especially - educated people?

I'm a biologist by training, a geneticist. I know the history of eugenics. It's not particularly pretty, even before the rise of the totalitarian regime in 1930s Germany.

The 'dream' of biologically 'cleansing' the human population of 'unfit' individuals much as we might when breeding cattle is more than a question of morality. It's not wrong just because the Nazis did it, or the Americans.

The problem is two-fold. Social, and Biological.

The Biological problem is that we just don't know enough to be sure of what we're doing. It's one thing to selectively breed sheep or cattle or wheat. It's another to suggest that we can remove all genetic 'abnormalities' from human populations. We can't do it with sheep or cattle or wheat, and we've been working on those for hundreds and thousands of years.

Even biotechnology is not perfect.

The other problem is Social. We are not uniform in our belief or acceptance of what is 'normal' or 'abnormal'. We don't even necessarily accept those distinctions. Who would get to decide?

Eugenics and it's biological and sociological problems have been grist for the sci-fi/speculative fiction mill since the early days of the genre. There are more problems than solutions.

But fundamentally, if we think that the majority can - or should - choose for the minority, I highly recommend you relive the past few thousand years of human history. Because, at the end of the day, there is no fucking way the majority gets to have that much say over people - not while we even vaguely have human rights left.

War on Terror be fucked. The scary shit is happening right here. In people's heads.
Mood:: 'infuriated' infuriated
Music:: Black & White 2
maelorin: (transmetro)
posted by [personal profile] maelorin at 08:51pm on 14/10/2005 under , , ,
Why is eugenics so attractive to people, even - especially - educated people?

I'm a biologist by training, a geneticist. I know the history of eugenics. It's not particularly pretty, even before the rise of the totalitarian regime in 1930s Germany.

The 'dream' of biologically 'cleansing' the human population of 'unfit' individuals much as we might when breeding cattle is more than a question of morality. It's not wrong just because the Nazis did it, or the Americans.

The problem is two-fold. Social, and Biological.

The Biological problem is that we just don't know enough to be sure of what we're doing. It's one thing to selectively breed sheep or cattle or wheat. It's another to suggest that we can remove all genetic 'abnormalities' from human populations. We can't do it with sheep or cattle or wheat, and we've been working on those for hundreds and thousands of years.

Even biotechnology is not perfect.

The other problem is Social. We are not uniform in our belief or acceptance of what is 'normal' or 'abnormal'. We don't even necessarily accept those distinctions. Who would get to decide?

Eugenics and it's biological and sociological problems have been grist for the sci-fi/speculative fiction mill since the early days of the genre. There are more problems than solutions.

But fundamentally, if we think that the majority can - or should - choose for the minority, I highly recommend you relive the past few thousand years of human history. Because, at the end of the day, there is no fucking way the majority gets to have that much say over people - not while we even vaguely have human rights left.

War on Terror be fucked. The scary shit is happening right here. In people's heads.
Music:: Black & White 2
Mood:: 'infuriated' infuriated

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
          1
 
2
 
3
 
4 5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31