Learn from the mistakes of others

for stupid people who don't ask questions like "why does stupid design not suggest more ..." stupid design is easy to grasp. unlike science - or to be more accurate, the scientific method, which is what the stupid design people are conveniently confusing with creationism.

stupid design says things are because they've been designed that way. what possible questions can arise out of that?

this may be preaching to the unconverted, but science is not just about 'describing the natural world' ...

what astounds me is that so many people assume they understand what science is, and even when they're told what science is, they still insist on confusing their imagined idea of science from their middle school fumblings with the real, grown up real thing™.

stupid design is lazy. saves you the fuss of thinking ... granted ... but the scientific method is all about thinking.