maelorin: (news)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
via slashdot:

June 27, 2006
Spain outlaws P2P filesharing
(Daily Variety Via Thomson Dialog NewsEdge)
MADRID

A Spanish intellectual property law has finally banned unauthorized peer-to-peer file-sharing in Spain, making it a civil offense even to download content for personal use.

The legislation, approved by Congress on Thursday, toughens previous provisions. An early May circular from Spain's fiscal general del estado, or chief prosecutor, allowed downloads for purely personal use.

Now Spaniards caught grabbing content from, say, eMule, will have to reimburse rights holders for losses --- although such losses will be difficult for authorities to track.

But the government is going after Internet service providers; it's a criminal offense for ISPs to facilitate unauthorized downloading.

The law also introduces a small tax to be levied on all blank media --- from a blank CD to mobile phones and even a memory stick. Computer hard disks and ADSL lines have been left out of the legislation despite their widespread use for illegally copying music and films. The money collected will be paid back to the owner of the copyright.

Spain's greater antipiracy clarity received a thumbs-up from the Motion Picture Assn.

"Compared to some European countries, Spain has some way to go in enforcement," said Duncan Hudson, the MPA's Brussels-based VP and director of operations for antipiracy, even though Spanish police closed 17 illegal Web sites in a nationwide raid April 8.

"But the new intellectual property law is a definite step forward, placing obligations for instance on ISPs to provide information. Hopefully, it will help us to get some injunctions," he added.

Spain's telco giant Telefonica reports 90% of usage on its broadband lines is Internet traffic, up from 15% five years ago. Of that 90%, a massive 71% is P2P traffic.

This comes after Microsoft announced in May that it had a deal with Spain's Terra Networks for distribution via P2P.

The tax on 'blank' media - including mobile phones - is an interesting development.
Music:: MC Lars - Download This Song
location: !Spain
Mood:: 'moody' moody
There are 4 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] molokov-au.livejournal.com at 09:25am on 29/06/2006
And more interesting copyright news of a different sort, also via Slashdot

Disney's trouble with Pooh bear. bbernard writes "It seems that the same laws that allow the Mouse to continue generating money for Disney have prevented Disney from taking control of Winny the Pooh. The Supreme Court has denied Clare Milne's bid to get the rights back for Pooh and his buddies. Clare is A.A. Milne's granddaughter, and her court battle was funded by Disney, as she was going to reassign the rights to them. Interesting to see a company foiled by the laws they insisted on in the first place, isn't it?"

maelorin: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] maelorin at 09:33am on 29/06/2006
This is what happens when you try social engineering by litigation or legislation. The Law™ doesn't care who uses it ... nor necessarily even how they use it.

And money isn't always the arbiter of value nor of right.
 
posted by [identity profile] verdigriis.livejournal.com at 05:27am on 01/07/2006
I think placing a tax on blank media (something our own government has thrown about) is both ridiculaous and unfair. Why should people who allready pay for their media also have to pay again to unknown numbers of copyright holders, just because someone else is engaging in piracy. Especially given that they probably allready pay a higher price for legitimately purchased media because the various media producers are using piracy as an excuse to jack up prices. Why should some of the money I pay for a blank DVD to backup my computer go to Sony or someone?

Likewise, how on earth will they decide which copyright holders get what? Can of worms doesn't even begin to cover that particular issue...
maelorin: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] maelorin at 10:10am on 01/07/2006
This is one of the ways you can pick when a special interest group has got it's way - insane idiocy in public policy espressed as "law reform".

I think the tax is supposed to fund a compensation fund to pay the copyright bleaters who don't get satisfaction from the people they can get convicted under these laws.

I predict a continuation of the overinflation of the 'value' of 'piracy' perpetrated by those who authorities can drag into court. And even more enthusiasm for pushing government to carry the costs of 'proving' copyright infringement for the billion-dollar corporations.

It is an interesting example of bad policy processes being exploited by special interest groups. I wonder how long this experiment will last. Probably far too long.

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
          1
 
2
 
3
 
4 5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31