posted by
maelorin at 03:56pm on 27/01/2005
beliefs drive people far more than rational thought.
the enlightenment may have ushered in a whole new way of thinking - but that's just the point. thinking as such wasn't new - but the emphasis on a certain kind of thinking was (at least, a renewed emphasis on it).
rationality is/was prized by this movement in the west;
but
people are not rational by rature, they have to be taught to be rational.
this has a number of consequences:
if have to be taught;
then education is important.
if we want people to be able to think rationally;
then we must provide education that achieves that goal;*
then education must be available to all;#
and it must be of high quality for all;%
and it must assess 'processeds' and 'outcomes' that ensure students are learning to think rationally;@
but it must also ensure that it is not mere indoctrination;^
or it will simply (re)establish totalitarianism.
and
if we want people to think rationally, we must provide incentives for them to do so.
---
* not hopes to, or manages for some, but does for as many as can - with means taken to ensure every opportunity is available for those having difficulties are assisted.
# really available for all, not just kinda available for the poor, and really laid on for the rich.
% education is not a commodity, it is not consumed - it is the means by which humans acquire survival skills.
@ the system, as well as the delivery, and the actual learning must be designed and executed with all this in mind.
^ rational thinking is a process, not an outcome. even the ancient greeks knew that. it is about how you think. what you think about, and the conclusions you draw, are not predetermined - thought they may be cisrcumscribed through the process.