maelorin: (no happy ever after)
Add MemoryShare This Entry

Monday, June 26, 2006
UK will not ask US to release Guantanamo detainee Hicks
Holly Manges Jones at 7:04 PM ET

[JURIST] The UK Foreign Office [official website] has said that the United Kingdom will not petition the US to release Australian national David Hicks [JURIST news archive; advocacy website] from the US prison at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive]. Hicks, a suspected member of the Taliban who has been detained for over four years, won British citizenship [JURIST report] earlier this year based on his mother's nationality and had hoped to gain assistance from the British government in securing his release. Nine other British detainees were freed - the last four in early 2005 [JURIST report] - when the UK protested their imprisonments by arguing that military commissions [JURIST news archive] are illegal. But Hicks will not receive the same type of aid from the British government, which says he was an Australian citizen at the time of his capture and that Australia has provided previous consular assistance to him.

Hicks has been charged with attempted murder and conspiracy to commit war crimes. His trial has been postponed pending a US
Supreme Court [official website] decision on the legality of military commissions [JURIST report], which is expected to be handed down before the end of June.

From Australia, ABC News has
local coverage.

Hicks just can't win a trick.

But then he must be a dangerous terrorist. You know, like, oh, some guy who recently converted and was very serious about it all. Is this guy who was picked out of a crowd because he was not like the others really so dangerous? Or just very, very inconvenient ...


Note: if you're Australian, don't expect the Australian government to help you out if it's not convenient for them ...
Mood:: 'sad' sad
Music:: Kyle XY 01x01 ... OMG ... why!!
There are 2 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] windypoint.livejournal.com at 02:10pm on 27/06/2006
I feel so sorry for Hicks. No matter what he has done, no matter what he has believed in, no matter what he still believes in, he deserves a far more open and transparent justice process than he's getting.
maelorin: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] maelorin at 05:58am on 29/06/2006
Unless it is open and transparent, it is not justice - only the exercise of power.

That much the so-called founding fathers of what is now the USA were not the only ones to agree upon.

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
          1
 
2
 
3
 
4 5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31