Learn from the mistakes of others

Hear the one about the investigating officer who works on their report on a public computer in an airport lounge on their way to deliver it? And then leaves it behind. [What a really, really, really, stupid thing to do. And who keeps important documents on floppy discs any more? Obviously Australia's Defence Forces ...]

Hear the one about the 'journalist' who decides to air portions of the draft report instead of handing it over to the relevant authorities?

For some reason, we haven't heard the one about the 'journalist' or their 'acquaintance' being asked to hand the report back.


Why is it that if people find something in a public place they immediately assume it's fair game?


Excuse me while I take a moment to wonder why Hinch can get away with being a completely arrogant prick, 'this wasn't the result of investigative journalism" (when was the last time Hinch did any investigative let alone journalism?) ... "an acquaintance found the report" (no, they found a disc and decided to see what was on it - what was their reward for handing it over to Hinch I wonder?) ... "blah blah".

Hinch must've wet himself with glee over this. A free opportunity to rub salt into an already wounded government organisation. No effort to help, just to get himself a few headlines ... and add insult to injury for the family of the soldier in question.

THIS is the kind of Failure that really gets me fucking pissed off! Complete failure of integrity.

It might be nothing new for Hinch, but that doesn't make it any more acceptable.

Hear the one about the investigating officer who works on their report on a public computer in an airport lounge on their way to deliver it? And then leaves it behind. [What a really, really, really, stupid thing to do. And who keeps important documents on floppy discs any more? Obviously Australia's Defence Forces ...]

Hear the one about the 'journalist' who decides to air portions of the draft report instead of handing it over to the relevant authorities?

For some reason, we haven't heard the one about the 'journalist' or their 'acquaintance' being asked to hand the report back.


Why is it that if people find something in a public place they immediately assume it's fair game?


Excuse me while I take a moment to wonder why Hinch can get away with being a completely arrogant prick, 'this wasn't the result of investigative journalism" (when was the last time Hinch did any investigative let alone journalism?) ... "an acquaintance found the report" (no, they found a disc and decided to see what was on it - what was their reward for handing it over to Hinch I wonder?) ... "blah blah".

Hinch must've wet himself with glee over this. A free opportunity to rub salt into an already wounded government organisation. No effort to help, just to get himself a few headlines ... and add insult to injury for the family of the soldier in question.

THIS is the kind of Failure that really gets me fucking pissed off! Complete failure of integrity.

It might be nothing new for Hinch, but that doesn't make it any more acceptable.

Crooks take kids' place

MAY 09, 2006 A STUDY by security company Panda Software finds that 70 per cent of the malicious software being circulated is linked to various types of cyber-crime.

Yay. Or something.

The report[*] suggests "financial profit has become a priority" for creators of malware, which includes viruses, worms, Trojan horses and spyware.

NO. There has been a change in the people who are creating and releasing these things. Thieves have a different motivation to script kiddies and others. It is possible that the motivation of some of these people have changed, but it would be erroneous to say that it's a general trend. That's confusing 'cause' and 'effect', making unwarranted assumptions - need to have/demonstrate more specific information to establish that assertion.

The survey marks a shift from several years ago, when malware was commonly created by script kiddies seeking attention or to expose security flaws.

There's also a lot more clueless money out there now too.

"Malware has become a tool for generating financial returns," the report says.

New business model?

The report says hackers are moving away from email worms to forms of malicious code that are more difficult to detect.

These are not hackers. They're thieves, fraudsters.

About 40 per cent of the problems detected by Panda were spyware. Another 17 per cent were Trojans including those that steal data on bank services.

At least the journalist can report this accurately: Panda cannot (and does not) assert that they have detected anything more than a sample of what's going on out there - and one constrained by their ability to detect them in the first place.

Others would download malicious applications to systems.

*sigh*

AFP [CeBIT.au06 on australianIT.com.au.]</td></tr>

[*] Can be downloaded from http://www.pandasoftware.com/pandalabsQ12006/ -> free registration required <-

Crooks take kids' place

MAY 09, 2006 A STUDY by security company Panda Software finds that 70 per cent of the malicious software being circulated is linked to various types of cyber-crime.

Yay. Or something.

The report[*] suggests "financial profit has become a priority" for creators of malware, which includes viruses, worms, Trojan horses and spyware.

NO. There has been a change in the people who are creating and releasing these things. Thieves have a different motivation to script kiddies and others. It is possible that the motivation of some of these people have changed, but it would be erroneous to say that it's a general trend. That's confusing 'cause' and 'effect', making unwarranted assumptions - need to have/demonstrate more specific information to establish that assertion.

The survey marks a shift from several years ago, when malware was commonly created by script kiddies seeking attention or to expose security flaws.

There's also a lot more clueless money out there now too.

"Malware has become a tool for generating financial returns," the report says.

New business model?

The report says hackers are moving away from email worms to forms of malicious code that are more difficult to detect.

These are not hackers. They're thieves, fraudsters.

About 40 per cent of the problems detected by Panda were spyware. Another 17 per cent were Trojans including those that steal data on bank services.

At least the journalist can report this accurately: Panda cannot (and does not) assert that they have detected anything more than a sample of what's going on out there - and one constrained by their ability to detect them in the first place.

Others would download malicious applications to systems.

*sigh*

AFP [CeBIT.au06 on australianIT.com.au.]</td></tr>

[*] Can be downloaded from http://www.pandasoftware.com/pandalabsQ12006/ -> free registration required <-